Six political parties not represented in Parliament have expressed varied views about the passage of the Electronic Transfer Levy (E-levy) last Tuesday.
Speaking in separate interviews with the Daily Graphic, some lauded the government for introducing measures to resuscitate the economy with the passage of the bill, while others felt the new tax would further burden the citizenry.
The parties are the People’s National Convention (PNC), the Convention People’s Party (CPP); the Progressive People’s Party (PPP); the All People’s Congress (APC); the Liberal Party of Ghana (LPG) and the National Democratic Party (NDP).
PNC
The General Secretary of the PNC, Madam Janet Nabla, told the Daily Graphic that taxation across the globe was the avenue countries depended on to generate income for development purposes.
She said the new tax measure was geared towards addressing the rising debts, creating jobs for the teeming youth, addressing infrastructural challenges, improving the transportation system, extending loans to the private sector and young entrepreneurs, etc.
“It is our considered view that we all, especially the Minority in Parliament, keep watch to ensure the above-stated issues are addressed by the E-Levy for the good of Ghana.
“We believe in generating funds internally and using those funds to develop areas we deem fit,” she said.
She urged Ghanaians to be on the government's neck to demand for stewardship and accountability.
CPP
The General Secretary of the CPP, Nana Yaa Akyempim Jantuah, described the E-Levy as obnoxious and punitive.
She said the party would support any legal action against the implementation of the E-Levy, stressing that the CPP stood with Ghanaians and did not want to see citizens go through pain by means of tax hardships and tax exploitation.
She said the CPP disagreed with the walkout staged by the Minority in Parliament during the discussion of the bill and was of the opinion that the opposition should have sat through and voted against it for all to see that they (NDC MPs) were really opposed to the bill.
PPP
For his part, the Director of Communications of the PPP, Mr Emmanuel Felix Mantey, reaffirmed his party’s stance against the introduction of the tax.
According to him, the solution to the current economic challenges in the country was not the imposition of new taxes but the effective and efficient administration of existing tax revenue measures.
He called on the government to invest resources in the productive sectors of the economy to raise enough resources for the development of the nation instead of slapping the already burdened citizenry with new taxes.
LPG
The Leader of the LPG, Mr Percival Kofi Akpaloo, welcomed the passage of the E-Levy, saying it would help transform the country.
He underscored the need for Ghanaians to support the initiative because the government could not run the affairs of the country without revenue.
On the walkout by the Minority in Parliament, Mr Akpaloo said it was a tool deployed by the NDC to demonstrate to their followers that they were opposed to the bill “but deep within them, they were in favour of the new levy”.
NDP
The General Secretary of the NDP, Alhaji Mohammed Frimpong, for his part said the E-Levy was a bitter pill that must be swallowed because Ghana needed the revenue to develop and support some of its social intervention programmes, including the Free SHS Policy rolled out over the years.
He said considering the fact that Ghana was in a defining moment of governance, political parties and the government in power must give the people firm assurances of leadership to enable them to support the levy and also contribute to holding government accountable in the best interest of the country at all times.
APC
The Founder of the APC, Mr Hassan Ayariga, said the passage of the E-Levy would encourage Ghanaians to pay taxes for the rapid socio-economic development of the country.
He, however, indicated that the mistrust that had greeted the introduction of the new levy was due to the fact that the government had not thoroughly accounted for the huge money borrowed over the years, leading to the downgrade of the economy by international rating agencies.
He said a section of Ghanaians did not trust that the money would be used for productive ventures to support the economy, and called on the government to avail itself for accountability from taxpayers on the usage of revenue generated from the E-Levy.
Source: graphiconline.com
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Peacefmonline.com. Peacefmonline.com accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content. Please report any inappropriate content to us, and we will evaluate it as a matter of priority. |
The "Speaker of Parliament" Hon. Alan Bagbin has created an ambigious situation for the passage of the e-levy. There are laws and regulations concerning decision making in the Parliament. We must differentiate between the laws and personal decisions. Seemingly, on the 29 of March during the Parliamentray proceedings, Hon. Bagbin might have ignored the laws abiding a decision making in parliament, especially regarding the passage of the e-levy. This has given the advantage for the manority, proceeding to the supreme court for legal clarification regarding the passage of the e-levy. There is a dust surrounding the competence of the speaker and the application of the laws in parliament. The speaker seems to be unclear about the rulings of the laws in the house when pressure is mounted on him. Ghanaians are expecting the SPEAKER to explain his practical role for the passage of the e-levy. Be bold and tell Ghanaians, what happened to the speaker during the parliamentary proceedings on 29 of March 2022. Meanwhile it is interesting to read that many african countries, like Rwanda, uganda, Bostwana have rejected the e-levy application due to large public out cry against it and also the complex application for the grassroots level. But it is also clear that, the economic leadership of Akufo-Addo and Bawumia must not look up to the e-levy as solution to Ghanas economic difficulties. There is the need for huge capital needed to finance seriuos development, such as industraliasation. There is no country in the world that has developed without industralisation and there is no country in the world that has industralised without the development of indigenous appropriate technology. Ghanaians dont pay the necessary taxes and therefore you have no choice but to go and borrow. There are so many areas of the Ghanaian economy that are virgin and untapped that the private sector wont go and therefore it is the duty of the government to go there and this is not what the current government want to do but rather using the e-levy as a means of taxation for socio-economic development. Its a cheap way and out of widening the tax net as a source of financial "CAPITAL". You cannot persuade Ghanaians to accept the e-levy that is needed to supports various projects. Modern economic books will tell us that it was private capital that led to British industralisation, German industralisation. Government must learn from economic history and go for CAPITAL for socio-economic industralisation.